SaaS scheduling platform
measurement audit. The delivered work was the audit; an end-to-end activation and paid-revenue implementation is not claimed.
Tracking & attribution engineeringClient work
I define the path from a created account to product activation and a confirmed payment, with identity gaps, retries and revenue changes visible.
Sounds familiar?
How I solve it
I build a measurement path from account creation through the activation you define to confirmed billing outcomes. Product records establish what happened; billing records establish what was paid. I keep user, account and customer identity distinct, join them where the evidence permits, and leave unresolved identity visible. Revenue definitions and permitted destinations are agreed before collection changes.
The process
6 steps. Scope and a fixed price are agreed before the first one.
Audit the current signup events, product records and billing outcomes read-only.
Agree account creation, activation and paid-state definitions with product and finance.
Define permitted identity joins between users, accounts and billing customers.
Specify events from the authoritative systems, with stable keys and duplicate handling.
Test a synthetic account through signup, activation, payment failure, payment and refund.
Reconcile the scoped lifecycle report with product and billing records, then hand over the exceptions.
Handover
Built with
Proof
Client work Done for real clients. Client details are anonymised.
Before → after
I audited measurement for a SaaS scheduling platform. That is the completed work behind this page. The intended implementation replaces disconnected signup and billing counters with an account lifecycle backed by product and payment records. It is a proposed build, not a result attributed to that audit client.
SaaS scheduling platform
measurement audit. The delivered work was the audit; an end-to-end activation and paid-revenue implementation is not claimed.
What you can look at
The proposed acceptance pack follows a synthetic account through the lifecycle and shows the distinction between a failed payment, a settled payment and a refund. It includes a replayed billing message, so one payment cannot quietly become two reported conversions.
The SaaS backing is an audit. Native-app measurement is capability work requiring its own scope; no delivered mobile attribution or completed SaaS revenue pipeline is claimed.
Price and timeline
A Tracking Health Check is USD 395 for one agreed lifecycle question. Implementation across product and billing can be a Custom Engineering Project from USD 1,500. I quote the event paths, identity joins, destinations and acceptance checks in writing. Native-app work needs a separate scope.
QuoteFixed before work starts
A note from Daniilbefore you decide
If your existing product analytics and billing reports already reconcile at account level, use them. If the business has not agreed what activation means, start with that definition; another event collector cannot decide it for you.
— Daniil
Questions
We agree that from your product: a completed action that demonstrates the account used its value. A login or page view does not automatically become activation.
That is a separate capability scope. I first check the app, permitted identifiers and available product and billing interfaces. I do not present the SaaS audit as a delivered native-app implementation.
The first answer is free, within one working day. Or write directly: next@taskfordaniel.com