Events and ticketing business
delivered AI-referral reporting. The milestone was accepted; there was no access to Ads for destination-side verification.
Data, reconciliation & reportingClient work
I build a landing-page report for observable AI referrals, conversions and revenue, with unknown traffic and attribution limits kept visible.
Sounds familiar?
How I solve it
I build a report from the evidence available in your analytics and business records. It groups observable AI referrals by landing page and shows the agreed outcomes beside them. I document the source rules, date window, page normalisation and revenue definition so someone else can reproduce the report. Missing evidence remains visible.
For the underlying channel and capture questions, read AI-referral traffic in GA4 and Shopify. This engagement applies that method to your sources and produces the reporting handover.
The process
6 steps. Scope and a fixed price are agreed before the first one.
Check the available analytics exports and whether conversion measurement is usable.
Agree which source evidence counts as an AI referral, with paid and organic traffic separated where observable.
Define landing-page normalisation without collapsing genuinely different pages.
Align the reporting window and join the agreed conversion and revenue measures at a defensible grain.
Check totals against the source exports and record unmatched or missing data.
Hand over the report, refresh procedure and rules for reading its limits.
Handover
Built with
Proof
Client work Done for real clients. Client details are anonymised.
Before → after
For an events and ticketing business, I delivered AI-referral reporting and the milestone was accepted. I did not have Ads access, so I do not claim destination-side ad verification. For your report, acceptance is a reproducible join whose totals match the available sources and whose unknowns remain visible.
Events and ticketing business
delivered AI-referral reporting. The milestone was accepted; there was no access to Ads for destination-side verification.
What you can look at
The proposed handover includes a synthetic landing-page report, a source-rule table and a reconciliation sheet. It shows a tagged referral, a referral with missing evidence and an unmatched conversion as different states. It does not relabel all Direct traffic as AI.
Client details anonymised. The backing is AI-referral reporting, not AI-checkout implementation or proof of total AI influence. Ads-side verification was unavailable in that engagement.
Price and timeline
A bounded reporting setup can be a Focused Fix from USD 450. A wider join across sources can be a Custom Engineering Project from USD 1,500. I check export availability before quoting; a proposed search feature or API is not treated as an available source until access is verified.
QuoteFixed before work starts
A note from Daniilbefore you decide
If the existing report answers the landing-page and outcome question with clear definitions, keep it. If the purchase or lead event is broken, fix that first. A report cannot restore a referral that was never recorded.
— Daniil
Questions
No. It reports the referral and conversion evidence your systems actually retain. Unknown source stays unknown, and a visit is not proof that an AI answer caused a sale.
Often a bounded report is enough. A wider join is useful when the source exports, revenue definitions or refresh requirements exceed that scope.
The first answer is free, within one working day. Or write directly: next@taskfordaniel.com